{"id":800809,"date":"2026-02-20T12:39:29","date_gmt":"2026-02-20T17:39:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=800809"},"modified":"2026-02-20T12:39:29","modified_gmt":"2026-02-20T17:39:29","slug":"the-arrl-solar-update-20","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=800809","title":{"rendered":"The ARRL Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">02\/20\/2026<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Solar activity returned to low levels this past week. The strongest<br \/>event of the period was a C1.8 flare on February 17 from region<br \/>4374. This region was also responsible for a C1.4 flare on February<br \/>18. The only other flare of note was a C1.1 flare on February 17<br \/>from an unnumbered plage region near S05E85. (A plage region is a<br \/>bright, intensely hot region in the Sun&#8217;s chromosphere, typically<br \/>found in active areas surrounding sunspots.)<\/p>\n<p>Region 4374 exhibited minor decay through the dissipation of its<br \/>trailing spots. Regions 4375 and 4377 were largely unchanged in area<br \/>and complexity.<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>A large filament eruption beyond the southwest limb was seen in SDO<br \/>and SUVI imagery starting approximately February 18. It was<br \/>associated with a Type II radio sweep that began on February 18 with<br \/>an estimated shock velocity of 310 km\/s. The eruption was first<br \/>visible in coronagraph imagery on February 18, but initial analysis<br \/>indicates no Earth-directed component. Solar activity is forecast to<br \/>be at low levels, with a slight chance for M-class<br \/>(R1-R2\/minor-moderate) flares through February 20.<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>Solar wind parameters continued to reflect the waning influence of a<br \/>positive polarity Coronal Hole High-Speed Stream (CH HSS). Solar<br \/>wind speed followed a general declining trend, decreasing from an<br \/>initial peak near 600 km\/s to approximately 500 km\/s by the end of<br \/>the reporting period. The solar wind environment is expected to<br \/>remain enhanced through February 20 due to continued but weakening<br \/>CH HSS influences.<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere, February 19, 2026, by F. K. Janda, OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Overall solar activity was relatively high in the first week of<br \/>February, with the number of sunspot groups on the solar disk<br \/>ranging from seven to nine. Over the next ten days, we observed an<br \/>almost uninterrupted decline, at the end of which there were only<br \/>three sunspot groups remaining on the disk.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Significant eruptions could only occur in one of them: AR 4374.<br \/>Before it set behind the western limb of the solar disk, one of the<br \/>few more powerful eruptions was observed in it. It happened on<br \/>February 16, with the peak at 0436 UT, accompanied by a CME,<br \/>partially heading towards Earth. The arrival was expected on<br \/>February 19. Although it did so at 1501 UT, Earth only encountered<br \/>the edge of the particle cloud &#8211; and in fact, almost nothing<br \/>happened.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Geomagnetic activity was elevated on February 15-16. The phenomenon<br \/>began with a positive phase of disturbance in the evening hours,<br \/>during which there was a noticeable improvement in shortwave<br \/>propagation conditions. A significant deterioration naturally<br \/>followed on February 16, partially also on February 17.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Any geomagnetic disturbance at the beginning of the predicted<br \/>period should be short (on 19th), while another disturbance can be<br \/>expected around February 24. Given that solar activity will be on<br \/>the rise again at that time, a positive phase of the disturbance can<br \/>be expected.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Geomagnetic field activity is expected to be at unsettled to active<br \/>levels on February 24 and 25, and on March 5 to 7 due to recurrent<br \/>negative polarity CH HSS effects. Active conditions are likely on<br \/>March 12 following a solar sector boundary crossing, then again on<br \/>March 14 with the onset of a positive polarity CH HSS.\u00a0 Barring the<br \/>potential for CME activity, mostly quiet to unsettled levels are<br \/>expected until February 23, and then February 26 to March 4.<\/p>\n<p>The Predicted Planetary A Index for February 21 to 27 is 5, 5, 8,<br \/>20, 20, 8, and 5, with a mean of 10.1.\u00a0 The Predicted Planetary K<br \/>Index is 2, 2, 3, 5, 5, 3, and 2, with a mean of 3.1.<br \/>10.7-centimeter flux is 105, 120, 130, 135, 130, 130, and 140, with<br \/>a mean of 127.1.<\/p>\n<p>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<br \/> and the ARRL Technical Information<br \/>Service web page at,  For<br \/>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<br \/> . Information and<br \/>tutorials on propagation can be found at,  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<em>Understanding Solar Indices<\/em>&#8221; from September 2002 <em>QST<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-arrl-solar-update-21?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>02\/20\/2026 Solar activity returned to low levels this past week. The strongestevent of the period was a C1.8 flare on February 17 from region4374. This region was also responsible for&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-800809","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/800809","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=800809"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/800809\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=800809"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=800809"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=800809"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}