{"id":800845,"date":"2026-02-23T15:29:28","date_gmt":"2026-02-23T20:29:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=800845"},"modified":"2026-02-23T15:29:28","modified_gmt":"2026-02-23T20:29:28","slug":"ngc-1637-hubble-wfc3-and-webb-nircam-images","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=800845","title":{"rendered":"NGC 1637 (Hubble WFC3 and Webb NIRCam images)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div id=\"modal__tab-content--details\">\n<div class=\"modal__tab-description\">\n<p>For the first time, astronomers have used images from the NASA\/ESA\/CSA James Webb Space Telescope to identify a supernova progenitor that could not be seen by any other telescope: a red supergiant that was located in a nearby galaxy. The supergiant\u2019s surroundings were surprisingly dusty &#8211; dusty enough to render it invisible to the NASA\/ESA Hubble Space Telescope.<\/p>\n<p>Forty million years ago, a star in a nearby galaxy exploded, spewing material across space and generating a brilliant beacon of light. That light traveled across the cosmos, reaching Earth on 29 June 2025, where it was detected by the All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae. Astronomers immediately turned their resources to this new supernova, designated 2025pht, to learn more about it. But one team of scientists instead turned to archives, seeking to use pre-supernova images to identify exactly which star among many had exploded. And they succeeded.<\/p>\n<p>Images of galaxy NGC 1637 taken by the James Webb Space Telescope showed a single red supergiant star located exactly where the supernova now shines. This represents the first published detection of a supernova progenitor by Webb. The results were\u00a0published\u00a0in the\u00a0<i>Astrophysical Journal Letters<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p><i>\u201cWe\u2019ve been waiting for this to happen \u2013 for a supernova to explode in a galaxy that Webb had already observed. We combined Hubble and Webb data sets to completely characterize this star for the first time,\u201d<\/i>\u00a0said lead author Charlie Kilpatrick of Northwestern University in the United States.<\/p>\n<p>The case of the missing red supergiants<\/p>\n<p>By carefully aligning\u00a0Hubble\u00a0and Webb images taken of NGC 1637, the team was able to identify the progenitor star in images taken by Webb\u2019s MIRI (Mid-Infrared Instrument) and NIRCam (Near-Infrared Camera) in 2024. They found that the star appeared surprisingly red \u2013 an indication that it was surrounded by dust that blocked shorter, bluer wavelengths of light.<\/p>\n<p><i>\u201cIt\u2019s the reddest, most dusty red supergiant that we\u2019ve seen explode as a supernova,\u201d\u00a0<\/i>said graduate student and co-author Aswin Suresh of Northwestern University.<\/p>\n<p>This excess of dust could help explain a long-standing problem in astronomy that could be described as the case of the missing red supergiants. Astronomers expect the most massive stars that explode as supernovas to also be the brightest and most luminous. So, they should be easy to identify in pre-supernova images. However, that hasn\u2019t been the case.<\/p>\n<p>One potential explanation is that the most massive aging stars are also the dustiest. If they\u2019re surrounded by large quantities of dust, their light could be dimmed to the point of undetectability. The Webb observations of supernova 2025pht support that hypothesis.<\/p>\n<p><i>\u201cI\u2019ve been arguing in favor of that interpretation, but even I didn\u2019t expect to see it as extreme as it was for supernova 2025pht. It would explain why these more massive supergiants are missing because they tend to be more dusty,\u201d<\/i>\u00a0said Kilpatrick.<\/p>\n<p>Carbon \u201cburps\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The team was not only surprised by the amount of dust, but also by its composition. Applying computer models to the Webb observations indicated that the dust is likely carbon-rich, when astronomers would have expected it to be more silicate-rich. The team speculates that this carbon might have been dredged up from the star\u2019s interior shortly before it exploded.<\/p>\n<p><i>\u201cHaving observations in the mid-infrared was key to constraining what kind of dust we were seeing,\u201d<\/i>\u00a0added Suresh.<\/p>\n<p>The team now is working to look for similar red supergiants that may explode as supernovas in the future.<\/p>\n<p>[Image description: An image labeled \u201cSN 2025pht in NGC 1637, Hubble WFC3 2024 + Webb NIRCam 2024\u201d. The majority of the image shows a face-on spiral galaxy speckled with myriad blue and red stars. The yellowish core of the galaxy forms a fuzzy oval tilted to the upper right. About halfway from the core to the edge of the image at about 4 o\u2019clock, a small region is outlined with a white box. A shaded, nearly transparent white triangle extends to a pullout at upper right labeled \u201cbefore explosion\u201d, with short lines forming a crosshair that points to a red star at the center. Below this are three more square images, all with crosshairs at the same location. 1) Hubble August 2024, with nothing visible in the crosshairs, 2) Webb October 2024, with a red star in the crosshairs, 3) Hubble July 2025, with a blue supernova in the crosshairs.]<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.esa.int\/ESA_Multimedia\/Images\/2026\/02\/NGC_1637_Hubble_WFC3_and_Webb_NIRCam_images?rand=772187\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For the first time, astronomers have used images from the NASA\/ESA\/CSA James Webb Space Telescope to identify a supernova progenitor that could not be seen by any other telescope: a&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":800846,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-800845","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-multimedia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/800845","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=800845"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/800845\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/800846"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=800845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=800845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=800845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}