{"id":801066,"date":"2026-03-09T09:25:29","date_gmt":"2026-03-09T14:25:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=801066"},"modified":"2026-03-09T09:25:29","modified_gmt":"2026-03-09T14:25:29","slug":"why-cosmology-seems-to-be-caught-in-a-vibe-shift","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=801066","title":{"rendered":"Why cosmology seems to be caught in a vibe shift"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div xmlns:default=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" id=\"\">\n<p xmlns:default=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n<figure class=\"ArticleImage\">\n<div class=\"Image__Wrapper\"><\/div><figcaption class=\"ArticleImageCaption\">\n<div class=\"ArticleImageCaption__CaptionWrapper\">\n<p class=\"ArticleImageCaption__Credit ArticleImageCaption__Credit--NoTitle\">NASA, ESA, CFHT, CXO, M.J. Jee (University of California, Davis), and A. Mahdavi (San Francisco State University)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>\n<p>A few years ago, the internet caught alight with talk of a \u201cvibe shift\u201d in what counts as cool. Skinny jeans and minimalism were out; baggy trousers and messy hair were in. Cue a minor panic for ageing millennials everywhere as it dawned on them that they were suddenly out of touch.<\/p>\n<p>Now, something similar is happening in cosmology. For years, physicists thought they had a neat understanding of how the universe works, a simple and elegant framework called the standard model of cosmology that gave an excellent account of how it began and evolved. At the heart of the model is dark energy, a force we admittedly can\u2019t identify but behaves predictably to force the universe to expand.<\/p>\n<p>Then, last year, explosive results from a telescope survey seemed to show the unthinkable: dark energy has been getting weaker over the history of the universe. If that is true, then the standard model of cosmology will need to be rewritten. In a package of three special features, we delve into the beauty of the standard model, reveal how endangered it really is and explore what might replace it.<\/p>\n<p xmlns:default=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n<figure class=\"Blockquote\" data-quote=\"Where the attachment to the old model is motivated by fear or nostalgia, that won't do\" data-component-name=\"pull-quote\">\n<blockquote class=\"Blockquote__Container\">\n<div class=\"Blockquote__QuoteDescription\">\n<p class=\"Blockquote__QuoteText\">\n                    <span class=\"Blockquote__QuoteText__Quote\">\u201c<\/span><br \/>\n                       Where the attachment to the old model is motivated by fear or nostalgia, that won\u2019t do<br \/>\n                    <span class=\"Blockquote__QuoteText__Quote\">\u201c<\/span>\n                <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/figure>\n<p>It must be said, though, that many physicists are still reluctant to abandon their cherished model. To some extent, this is fair enough. As with so many apparently convincing results in modern physics, the dark energy findings may not stand the test of time. But where the attachment to the old model is motivated by fear of the unknown or nostalgia for simpler times, that won\u2019t do.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"js-content-prompt-opportunity\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Scientists tend not to talk of vibe shifts, but of paradigm shifts \u2013 periods when our lens of understanding fundamentally changes. History teaches us that paradigm shifts are a good thing. They are discombobulating, no question, but allow us to see reality more clearly. We aren\u2019t yet sure if the challenge to dark energy really will amount to a paradigm shift akin to the quantum or Copernican revolutions \u2013 but if it does, we will look back on this period of cosmology as a thrilling time to be alive. Bring on the new vibe.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/article\/mg26935851-300-why-cosmology-seems-to-be-caught-in-a-vibe-shift\/?utm_campaign=RSS%7CNSNS&#038;utm_source=NSNS&#038;utm_medium=RSS&#038;utm_content=space&#038;rand=772163\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NASA, ESA, CFHT, CXO, M.J. Jee (University of California, Davis), and A. Mahdavi (San Francisco State University) A few years ago, the internet caught alight with talk of a \u201cvibe&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":801067,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-801066","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-new-scientist"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/801066","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=801066"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/801066\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/801067"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=801066"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=801066"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=801066"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}