{"id":801176,"date":"2026-03-16T12:20:31","date_gmt":"2026-03-16T17:20:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=801176"},"modified":"2026-03-16T12:20:31","modified_gmt":"2026-03-16T17:20:31","slug":"m2-7-solar-flare-erupts-from-region-4392-cme-produced","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=801176","title":{"rendered":"M2.7 solar flare erupts from Region 4392, CME produced"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n

A Type II Radio Emission with an estimated velocity of 1 227 km\/s was associated with the flare, indicating a coronal mass ejection (CME) was produced. A Type IV radio emission was detected at 12:12 UTC, suggesting a strong CME was produced.<\/p>\n

Additionally, a 10cm Radio Burst lasting 8 minutes and with a peak flux of 380 sfu was registered from 12:09 to 12:17 UTC. A 10cm radio burst indicates that the electromagnetic burst associated with a solar flare at the 10cm wavelength was double or greater than the initial 10cm radio background. <\/p>\n

This can be indicative of significant radio noise in association with a solar flare. This noise is generally short-lived but can cause interference for sensitive receivers, including radar, GPS, and satellite communications.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n

\u201cThere are indications of a possible associated CME,\u201d SWPC forecasters said. \u201cWe are currently waiting for coronagraph imagery to be available in order to determine if a CME indeed erupted from the Sun and, if so, to analyze and model it to determine a potential Earth-directed component.\u201d<\/p>\n

Radio frequencies were forecast to be most degraded over the Atlantic Ocean, Africa, and southern Europe at the time of the event.<\/p>\n

\n
\"drap
Image credit: SWPC<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

Solar activity was at low levels in 24 hours to 12:30 UTC today. Region 4395 (beta) produced a C1.1 flare at 15:09 UTC on March 15 \u2014 the strongest of the period. Minor growth was observed in the region as well as in Region 4392 (gamma) \u2014 the source of today\u2019s M2.7.<\/p>\n

The remaining active regions on the visible disk were either stable or in gradual decay.<\/p>\n

\n
\"sunspots
Sunspots on March 16, 2026. Credit: NASA\/SDO HMI<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

The >2 MeV electron flux reached high levels, peaking at 1 430 pfu at 19:00 UTC on March 15, while the >10 MeV proton flux remained at background levels. The electron flux is expected to remain at high levels through March 18, while the proton flux is expected to stay at background levels over the same period.<\/p>\n

Solar wind conditions over the past 24 hours reflected the continued influence of a positive polarity coronal hole high-speed stream (CH HSS).<\/p>\n

The total magnetic field measured 5\u20136 nT, while the Bz component fluctuated between \u00b15 nT. Solar wind speeds gradually decreased from peaks of about 675 km\/s to around 500 km\/s by the end of the period, with the phi angle predominantly oriented in a positive solar sector.<\/p>\n

\n
\"rtsw
Image credit: SWPC<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

Solar wind parameters are expected to remain elevated but gradually decline through March 18. <\/p>\n

Geomagnetic field activity reached unsettled levels during the past 24 hours. Geomagnetic conditions are expected to be primarily quiet to unsettled from March 16\u201318, with isolated active periods possible on March 16.<\/p>\n

Solar activity is expected to be at low levels, with a slight chance for M-class flares through March 18.<\/p>\n

References:<\/p>\n

1<\/sup> Forecast Discussion \u2013 NOAA\/SWPC \u2013 Issued at 12:30 UTC on March 16, 2026<\/p>\n


\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n


\n
Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A Type II Radio Emission with an estimated velocity of 1 227 km\/s was associated with the flare, indicating a coronal mass ejection (CME) was produced. A Type IV radio… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":801177,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-801176","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-space-weather-reports"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/801176","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=801176"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/801176\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/801177"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=801176"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=801176"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=801176"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}