- \n
- Life as we know it needs water to exist.<\/strong> But how much<\/em> water does an exoplanet need to be habitable in the long term?<\/li>\n
- More water than previously thought<\/strong> is the answer suggested by a new study.<\/li>\n
- At least 20 to 50% of the water on Earth<\/strong> would be required. Otherwise, the planet might start losing water on its surface and become arid.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
You deserve a daily dose of good news.<\/strong> For the latest in science and the night sky, click here to subscribe to our free daily newsletter.<\/p>\n
How much water does an exoplanet need to stay habitable?<\/h3>\n
Astronomers consider water to be essential for life as we know it to form on a given planet. But, unfortunately, not all watery worlds stay watery. Venus, according to some studies, once had as much water as Earth does \u2026 but is now scorching hot, arid, and lifeless.<\/p>\n
A new study from researchers at the University of Washington in Seattle suggests that Venus starting out with slightly less water than Earth could have made all the difference. The researchers said on April 15, 2026, that this lack of water could have destabilized the cycle of carbon between the planet\u2019s atmosphere and interior. This would have caused carbon dioxide to build up in the air, raising temperatures and causing more water to evaporate.<\/p>\n
So how much water does a world need to stay habitable? The study suggests that a rocky Earth-sized planet would need at least 20 to 50% of the water in Earth\u2019s oceans to avoid this fate. That should be enough to maintain the crucial carbon cycle, keeping water on the surface long enough to potentially give water-based life time to develop.<\/p>\n
This applies to planets in the habitable zone of their stars in particular. That\u2019s the region where temperatures could allow liquid water to exist to begin with.<\/p>\n
The researchers \u2013 lead author Haskelle Trigue White-Gianella and co-author Joshua Krissansen-Totton \u2013 published their new peer-reviewed results in The Planetary Science Journal<\/em> on April 15, 2026.<\/p>\n
The habitable zone<\/h3>\n
Scientists have long focused on the habitable zone around stars in the search for life. That\u2019s because this is where liquid water could exist on rocky planets. But that depends on other factors, too, such as the composition of the atmosphere (if there is one) and the planet itself. White-Gianella said:<\/p>\n
\n
When you are searching for life in the broad landscape of the universe with limited resources, you have to filter out some planets.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
Carbon Cycle Imbalances on Arid Terrestrial Planets with Implications for Venus: iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.3\u2026 -> Planets need more water to support life than scientists previously thought: www.washington.edu\/news\/2026\/04\u2026<\/p>\n
\u2014 (@cosmos4u.bsky.social) 2026-04-15T22:26:18.349Z<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Arid planets with little water<\/h3>\n
To try to determine how much water a planet needs to be habitable, the study focused on arid planets that likely only have a little water. White-Gianella explained:<\/p>\n
\n
We were interested in arid planets with very limited surface water inventory, far less than one Earth ocean. Many of these planets are in the habitable zone of their star, but we weren\u2019t sure if they could actually be habitable.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
The carbon cycle<\/h3>\n
Since some of those planets are in the habitable zone, could they be habitable even with less water?<\/p>\n
The researchers found that it depends on something called the carbon cycle. This cycle, driven by water, exchanges carbon between the atmosphere and interior of the planet, over millions of years. This process helps stabilize temperatures on the surface of the planet.<\/p>\n
How does it work? Volcanoes emit carbon dioxide. The carbon dioxide accumulates in the atmosphere. Eventually it falls back to Earth in rain. Subsequently, the rain erodes and chemically reacts with rocks. The runoff in rivers brings the carbon back to the ocean, where it sinks down to the seafloor. Carbon-rich oceanic plates then move below the continental plates. Finally, millions of years later, the carbon comes back up to the surface in the form of mountains.<\/p>\n
Low water levels<\/h3>\n
But there\u2019s a catch. What if water levels drop too low for rainfall to occur? The carbon removal segment of the cycle \u2013 erosion by rain \u2013 can no longer keep up with carbon emissions from volcanoes. As a result, carbon dioxide builds up in the atmosphere. And this could create a runaway greenhouse effect, with temperatures becoming too hot to sustain life. This is what scientists say happened with Venus. As White-Gianella noted:<\/p>\n
\n
So that, unfortunately, makes these arid planets within habitable zones unlikely to be good candidates for life.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Krissanen-Totton said:<\/p>\n
\n
This has implications for a lot of the potentially habitable real estate out there.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
![\"Smiling](\"https:\/\/earthsky.org\/upl\/2026\/04\/Haskelle-Trigue-White-Gianella-University-of-Washington.jpg\")
Haskelle Trigue White-Gianella at the University of Washington is the lead author of the new study about water on exoplanets. Image via University of Washington.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n Updating previous carbon models<\/h3>\n
The new carbon model of the study, focusing on arid planets, is an update to previous models. Those models focused more on water and cooler planets. They included factors such as evaporation from sunlight. But they neglected other factors, such as wind. Krissanen-Totton explained:<\/p>\n
\n
These sophisticated, mechanistic models of the carbon cycle have emerged from people trying to understand how Earth\u2019s thermostat has worked \u2013 or hasn\u2019t \u2013 to regulate temperature through time.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
The new results show that even if a planet starts out with lots of surface water, it can lose it later on if the carbon cycle is interrupted.<\/p>\n
![\"Planet](\"https:\/\/earthsky.org\/upl\/2024\/04\/Venus-Akatsuki-October-24-2018.jpeg\")
View larger. | Japan\u2019s Akatsuki (Venus Climate Orbiter) spacecraft captured this view of Venus on October 24, 2018. Venus is a good analog for exoplanets that lose their water and become arid and inhospitable to life on their surfaces. Image via JAXA\/ ISAS\/ DARTS\/ Kevin M. Gill (CC BY 2.0).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n Venus as an exoplanet analog<\/h3>\n
We already know of one such planet, and it\u2019s in our own solar system: Venus. Scientists think Venus once had much more water, maybe even oceans. But Venus has since lost that water. Why?<\/p>\n
Today, Venus is scorching hot on its surface, too hot for life. The dense carbon dioxide atmosphere traps heat so it can\u2019t escape.<\/p>\n
The researchers in the new study suggest that Venus might have had slightly less water than Earth early on. This caused an imbalance in the carbon cycle. And as the carbon dioxide accumulated in the atmosphere, the temperature kept rising.<\/p>\n
Venus is a good analog for the kinds of exoplanets the researchers studied. As White-Gianella noted:<\/p>\n
\n
It\u2019s very unlikely that we will land something on the surface of an exoplanet in our lifetime, but Venus \u2013 our next-door neighbor \u2013 is arguably the best exoplanet analog.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Speaking of Venus, another study, from 2025, suggests that Venus actually has more<\/em> water in its atmosphere than previously thought. It\u2019s still fire and brimstone on the surface, but perhaps this water could help sustain microbes that scientists have postulated could survive higher up in the atmosphere.<\/p>\n
Bottom line: How much water on exoplanets does life need? A new study suggests at least 20 to 50% of the water on Earth.<\/p>\n
Source: Carbon Cycle Imbalances on Arid Terrestrial Planets with Implications for Venus<\/p>\n
Via University of Washington<\/p>\n
Read more: Water on exoplanets is mostly hidden deep inside<\/p>\n
Read more: New study says water in Venus\u2019 clouds surprisingly abundant<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n
\n - More water than previously thought<\/strong> is the answer suggested by a new study.<\/li>\n