{"id":802123,"date":"2026-05-08T17:07:30","date_gmt":"2026-05-08T22:07:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=802123"},"modified":"2026-05-08T17:07:30","modified_gmt":"2026-05-08T22:07:30","slug":"the-arrl-solar-update-28","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=802123","title":{"rendered":"The ARRL Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">05\/08\/2026<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Solar activity was at low levels this past week with occasional<br \/>B-class and isolated low-level C-class flares. The largest event of<br \/>the period was a C1.4\/Sf flare from Region 4429 on May 5.<\/p>\n<p>There are currently six numbered regions on the visible disk as 4434<br \/>decayed to plage and Region 4428 rotated beyond the western limb as<br \/>an E-type group. The remaining regions mostly showed signs of decay.<br \/>Region 4425 appeared stable, though full characterization is<br \/>difficult due to extreme limb proximity. Region 4429 showed continued<br \/>submergence and decay, decreasing in both area and length along with<br \/>a total loss of penumbra.<\/p>\n<p>Region 4431 showed some minor new development, with a few small spots<br \/>emerging in both polarities following recent decay. Region 4432 had<br \/>minor emergence in its intermediate spots, despite an overall gradual<br \/>decrease in extent. The remaining regions were mostly stable.<\/p>\n<p>No Earth-directed CMEs were observed in available coronagraph<\/p>\n<p>Flare probabilities increase beginning May 8 as up to two active<br \/>regions rotate into view from beyond the eastern limb.<br \/>Considering the size of these regions and recent far-side eruptions<br \/>seen in coronagraph imagery, solar activity is expected to increase<br \/>May 8 &#8211; 9 with a chance for M-class (R1-R2\/minor-moderate) flares and<br \/>a slight chance for X-class (R3\/strong or greater) flares.<\/p>\n<p>Solar wind parameters returned to near background levels as transient<br \/>coronal mass ejection (CME) influences waned. Solar wind speeds<br \/>averaged around 375 km\/s. The phi angle was predominantly in a<br \/>positive (away) orientation for the majority of the period with a few<br \/>short-lived oscillations into a negative (toward) orientation during<br \/>the period.<\/p>\n<p>Spaceweather.com reports a big and active sunspot hiding behind the<br \/>sun&#8217;s northeastern limb is about to reveal itself, rotating into view<br \/>this weekend. A dramatic M2-class solar flare on May 7th confirmed<br \/>its approach. The unnamed sunspot has produced at least 5 CMEs in<br \/>recent days. If this production continues, Earth could soon be in<br \/>line for a solar storm.<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere,\u00a0 May 7, 2026, by F. K. Janda, OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>Overall solar activity declined slowly but steadily in late April and<br \/>early May. Eruptive activity was low, with active regions mostly and<br \/>featuring a simple magnetic field configuration. Geomagnetic activity<br \/>increased significantly only on May 4, after which the polarity of<br \/>the longitudinal component of the interplanetary magnetic field<br \/>returned to positive values. The ionosphere returned to a state<br \/>favorable for shortwave propagation since May 6.<\/p>\n<p>Solar activity is likely to remain at current levels, while should<br \/>decline shortly and slightly in mid-May. Geomagnetically quiet days<br \/>can be expected starting May 10 again. Prior to that, there will be a<br \/>slight increase in activity, likely on May 8. No other significant<br \/>fluctuations are likely.<\/p>\n<p>The latest solar report from Dr. Tamitha Skov, WX6SWW, can be found<br \/>on YouTube. https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=lNcaoB7be-k<\/p>\n<p>The Predicted Planetary A Index for May 9 to May 15 is 10, 6, 5, 5,<br \/>5, 5, and 25 with a mean of 8.7. The Predicted Planetary K Index is<br \/>3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, and 5 with a mean of 2.6. 10.7 centimeter flux is<br \/>130, 130, 125, 125, 120, 115, and 120 with a mean of 123.6.<br \/>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<\/span><br \/>http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/propagation<span><span>\u00a0<\/span>and the ARRL Technical Information<\/span><br \/><span>Service web page at,<span>\u00a0<\/span><\/span>http:\/\/arrl.org\/propagation-of-rf-signals<span>. For<\/span><br \/><span>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<\/span><br \/>http:\/\/arrl.org\/the-sun-the-earth-the-ionosphere<span><span>\u00a0<\/span>. Information and<\/span><br \/><span>tutorials on propagation can be found at,<span>\u00a0<\/span><\/span>http:\/\/k9la.us\/<span><span>\u00a0<\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Also, check this:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p><span>&#8220;<\/span><em>Understanding Solar Indices<\/em><span>&#8221; from September 2002<span>\u00a0<\/span><\/span><em>QST<\/em><span>.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-arrl-solar-update-29?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>05\/08\/2026 Solar activity was at low levels this past week with occasionalB-class and isolated low-level C-class flares. The largest event ofthe period was a C1.4\/Sf flare from Region 4429 on&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-802123","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/802123","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=802123"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/802123\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=802123"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=802123"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=802123"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}