{"id":802364,"date":"2026-05-27T09:28:31","date_gmt":"2026-05-27T14:28:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=802364"},"modified":"2026-05-27T09:28:31","modified_gmt":"2026-05-27T14:28:31","slug":"brief-s1-solar-radiation-storm-observed-after-large-far-side-cme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=802364","title":{"rendered":"Brief S1 solar radiation storm observed after large far side CME"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p><strong>High-energy solar protons briefly reached S1 \u2013 Minor solar radiation storm levels on May 26, 2026, following a large partial halo coronal mass ejection (CME) from the far side of the Sun. The eruption was first detected by the GOES-19 CCOR-1 coronagraph at 22:00 UTC on May 25. Forecast calls for\u00a0a 10% chance of another S1 or stronger solar radiation storm on May 27.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Proton levels were already falling by the start of May 27 after reaching S1 solar radiation storm levels on May 26. The event was linked to a large far-sided partial halo CME. The decline slowed after about 17:15 UTC on May 26 when the greater than 10 MeV proton flux averaged about 1 pfu, below NOAA\u2019s S-scale storm threshold.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By 12:30 UTC on May 27, solar radiation levels observed by GOES-19 over the previous 24 hours were below storm levels. Elevated background proton levels kept a small chance of renewed S1 or stronger conditions in the latest forecast, with probabilities of just 10% on May 27, 5% on May 28, and 5% on May 29.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Solar activity remained low during the same period over the past 24 hours. The strongest flare was a C9.7 from Region 4446 at 12:38 UTC on May 26, while several partly hidden flares were observed on the northeast limb as a new sunspot group rotated onto the visible disk.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Image credit: NOAA\/SWCP<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A Type II radio emission began at 12:44 UTC on May 26 and was likely associated with the C9.7 flare. The estimated shock speed was 650 km\/s (404 mi\/s), but any related CME was too faint or narrow to be seen clearly in available coronagraph imagery.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A separate faint, possibly partial halo CME seen from about 22:30 UTC on May 26 was still under analysis.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An S1 storm is the lowest level on NOAA\u2019s solar radiation storm scale and can cause minor high-frequency radio effects in polar regions. Stronger S2 to S5 storms can affect satellites, navigation systems, aviation, and biological exposure risk.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">References:<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><sup>1<\/sup> Forecast Discussion \u2013 NOAA\/SWPC \u2013 May 26\/27, 2026<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/watchers.news\/2026\/05\/27\/brief-s1-solar-radiation-storm-observed-after-large-far-side-cme\/?rand=772108\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>High-energy solar protons briefly reached S1 \u2013 Minor solar radiation storm levels on May 26, 2026, following a large partial halo coronal mass ejection (CME) from the far side of&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":802365,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-802364","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-space-weather-reports"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/802364","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=802364"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/802364\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/802365"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=802364"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=802364"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=802364"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}