{"id":802883,"date":"2026-07-01T21:17:33","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T02:17:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=802883"},"modified":"2026-07-01T21:17:33","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T02:17:33","slug":"the-arrl-solar-update-33","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=802883","title":{"rendered":"The ARRL Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">06\/05\/2026<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0Solar activity went from low to high this week. Activity was<\/p>\n<p>dominated by Region 4455, which produced frequent C-class flares<br \/>\nalongside three significant flare events: an M9.3\/Sf on June 1; as<br \/>\nwell as an M7.7\/1b and an X1.0\/1n on June 3.\u00a0<br \/>\n\u00a0<br \/>\nThere are eight numbered regions on the visible disk. Region 4455<br \/>\nremains complex, maintaining its anti-Hale configuration and<br \/>\ndisplaying a newly developed delta structure. Continuous flux<br \/>\nemergence and spot growth with penumbral development were observed<br \/>\njust ahead of its mature, positive polarity lead spot. Regions 4458<br \/>\nand 4459 both showed growth and consolidation, with Region 4459<br \/>\nshowing rapid spot development in its trailing area and gaining a<br \/>\nmixed-polarity gamma configuration. Region 4461 also showed flux<br \/>\nemergence driving a gamma configuration, though extreme<br \/>\nforeshortening near the limb limits high-confidence analysis of its<br \/>\noverall complexity. Region 4462 consolidated and showed increased<br \/>\nseparation between its poles. The remaining regions were stable or in<br \/>\ndecline.<br \/>\nSeveral eruptive events occurred during the reporting period. An<br \/>\nM9.3\/Sf flare June 1 was accompanied by wideband radio emissions,<br \/>\nincluding a Type IV radio sweep with an estimated shock velocity of<br \/>\n253 km\/s, and a 10.7-cm radio burst. An associated coronal mass<br \/>\nejection (CME) became visible in LASCO C2 imagery on June 2. While<br \/>\nfaint in coronagraph imagery, GOES\/SUVI imagery implies a partial to<br \/>\nfull halo profile, and COR2 triangulation confirms an Earth-directed<br \/>\ncomponent. Modeling indicates this event is the most Earth-directed<br \/>\nCME of the period\u2019s events.<br \/>\nThe M7.7\/1B flare on June 3 was accompanied by wideband radio<br \/>\nemissions, including a Type IV sweep, a Type II sweep with an<br \/>\nestimated shock velocity of 313 km\/s, and a prominent three-minute<br \/>\n10.7-cm radio burst. The associated CME was first seen in LASCO C2 on<br \/>\nJune 3. GOES\/SUVI 304 imagery shows much of the ejecta was deflected<br \/>\nsignificantly northward by an adjacent positive polarity coronal<br \/>\nhole. STEREO COR2 imagery and modeling shows that, while it retains<br \/>\nan Earth-directed glancing component, it is the least<br \/>\ndirectly-targeted event of the period.<br \/>\nSolar activity is expected to be at moderate to high levels through<br \/>\nJune 6. M-class (R1-R2\/minor-moderate) flaring remains likely, with a<br \/>\nslight chance for X-class (R3\/strong or greater) events, primarily<br \/>\ndue to the eruptive capabilities of Regions 4455, 4458, and 4459.<br \/>\nSolar wind parameters continued to be slightly elevated with<br \/>\nconditions reflecting possible embedded transient influences. Wind<br \/>\nspeeds held steady near 400 km\/s for most of the period before a<br \/>\ndistinct increase to near 450 km\/s late in the period. The phi angle<br \/>\nshowed a distinct transition into the positive (away from the Sun)<br \/>\nsector late in the period.\u00a0<br \/>\n\u00a0<br \/>\nMild enhancements are expected early on June 4 under the initial<br \/>\nonset of positive polarity high-speed stream (+CH HSS) influences.<br \/>\nConditions will escalate dramatically mid-to-late on June 4 with the<br \/>\narrival of the multiple June 3 CMEs. These significant enhancements<br \/>\nare expected to persist through June 5 with elevated conditions<br \/>\npersisting through June 6.<br \/>\n\u00a0<br \/>\nWeekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>\nIonosphere, June 4, 2026, by F. K. Janda, OK1HH:<br \/>\n\u00a0<br \/>\nOn May 28, a large sunspot group, AR 4455, began to emerge on the<br \/>\nnortheastern limb of the solar disk. Its activity had already been<br \/>\nmonitored in the preceding days by the Solar Orbiter spacecraft,<br \/>\nwhile we were also aware of it thanks to helioseismological<br \/>\nobservations. In the first days of June, AR 4455 gradually grew,<br \/>\nwhile its configuration pointed to future growth in eruptive<br \/>\nactivity. A series of moderately energetic eruption eruptions on June<br \/>\n2 turned out to be precursors. The main event, featuring four<br \/>\nenergetically significant eruptions, took place on June 3, with at<br \/>\nleast two of them accompanied by a coronal mass ejection (CME), while<br \/>\nat least one of which was headed directly toward Earth.\u00a0<br \/>\n\u00a0<br \/>\nThese lines you are currently reading are being written on June 4 at<br \/>\naround 16:00 UT, just before more than one particle cloud is expected<br \/>\nto hit Earth, marking the start of a geomagnetic disturbance. The<br \/>\ndisturbance is expected to intensify on June 5 and is likely to<br \/>\ncontinue, albeit with lower intensity, on June 6.<br \/>\n\u00a0<br \/>\nThe latest development in solar activity therefore differs<br \/>\nsignificantly from what we witnessed in May, during the previous<br \/>\nsolar rotation, when solar activity was low and the magnetosphere<br \/>\nremained calm in the following days.\u00a0<br \/>\n\u00a0<br \/>\nConclusion: Ionospheric propagation conditions during the first<br \/>\nweekend of June will be variable and generally poor, with low MUF<br \/>\nvalues. Although a noticeable improvement is expected in the coming<br \/>\ndays due to increased solar activity, another geomagnetic disturbance<br \/>\ncan be expected as early as June 10. The only certainty is change!<br \/>\n\u00a0<br \/>\nThe Predicted Planetary A Index for June 6 to June 12 is 8, 5, 5, 5,<br \/>\n5, 30, and 25 with a mean of 11.9. The Predicted Planetary K Index is<br \/>\n3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 6, and 5 with a mean of 3.1. 10.7 centimeter flux is<br \/>\n125, 125, 120, 120, 130, 135, and 135 with a mean of 127.1.<br \/>\n\u00a0<br \/>\n<span>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<\/span><br \/><span><span> <\/span>and the ARRL Technical Information<\/span><br \/><span>Service web page at,<span> <\/span><\/span>http:\/\/arrl.org\/propagation-of-rf-signals<span>. For<\/span><br \/><span>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<\/span><br \/><span><span> <\/span>. Information and<\/span><br \/><span>tutorials on propagation can be found at,<span> <\/span><\/span><span><span> <\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Also, check this:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p><span>&#8220;<\/span><em>Understanding Solar Indices<\/em><span>&#8221; from September 2002<span> <\/span><\/span><em>QST<\/em><span>.<\/span>\t\t<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-arrl-solar-update-32?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>06\/05\/2026 \u00a0Solar activity went from low to high this week. Activity was dominated by Region 4455, which produced frequent C-class flares alongside three significant flare events: an M9.3\/Sf on June&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-802883","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/802883","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=802883"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/802883\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=802883"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=802883"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=802883"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}