{"id":803141,"date":"2026-07-26T07:39:34","date_gmt":"2026-07-26T12:39:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=803141"},"modified":"2026-07-26T07:39:34","modified_gmt":"2026-07-26T12:39:34","slug":"are-we-listening-for-alien-intelligence-the-wrong-way","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=803141","title":{"rendered":"Are we listening for alien intelligence the wrong way?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_553294\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-553294\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-553294\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">This is the Atacama Large Millimeter\/submillimeter Array (ALMA) radio telescope in the Chilean Andes. Here, it\u2019s observing the sky on a night when the moon (not pictured) brightens the darkness. Now, for the first time, a team of astronomers has used ALMA to listen for signals from alien intelligence. They said perhaps we should be listening at higher frequencies. Image via ALMA\/ Alex P\u00e9rez.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Science matters. Wonder matters. You matter. <strong>Join our 2026 Donation Campaign today.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>Alien intelligence: Have we been searching wrong?<\/h3>\n<p>In the movie Contact, Jodie Foster\u2019s character \u2013 the astronomer Ellie Arroway \u2013 sits by a row of radio telescopes, listening through headphones for signals from alien intelligence. This scene has become symbolic of SETI (the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence). But now it turns out Ellie\u2019s character, and SETI astronomers generally, might have been listening to the wrong radio channels.<\/p>\n<p>SETI astronomers search for radio signals, mostly from a specific band of the radio spectrum: the frequencies between 1.42 and 1.66 GHz. And, on July 24, 2026, Louisa Mason of the University of Manchester in the U.K. said we might be searching in the wrong way. She told astronomers attending the National Astronomy Meeting in Birmingham in the U.K. that different radio frequencies might yield a result.<\/p>\n<p>Astronomers originally chose the frequencies between 1.42 and 1.66 GHz, which they call the <em>water hole<\/em>, because of its location between hydrogen (H) and hydroxyl (OH). These elements combine to form water. And astronomers think water is likely essential to life.  Besides the relation to water, this frequency is exceptionally quiet and free of background noise. So it would be a good frequency for aliens to communicate across vast distances, like a cosmic watering hole.<\/p>\n<p>But Mason suggests we should be looking at higher radio frequencies. And she\u2019s already gotten started. Mason and her colleagues looked at data from past observations with the Atacama Large Millimeter\/submillimeter Array (ALMA) radio telescope in Chile. <\/p>\n<p>It was the first-ever search for extraterrestrial intelligence using the powerful ALMA telescope.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_553295\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-553295\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/earthsky.org\/upl\/2026\/07\/frequency-of-radio-telescopes-Louisa-Mason-CC-BY-4-e1784900299323.png\" alt=\"Graph showing mostly short horizontal bars of different colors, rising up to the right in increments.\" width=\"800\" height=\"413\" class=\"size-full wp-image-553295\"\/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-553295\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Graph showing the frequencies that certain radio telescopes are sensitive to. ALMA, in yellow, covers a higher frequency that previous searches for extraterrestrial intelligence have not yet explored. Image via Louisa Mason.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3>The search for aliens using ALMA<\/h3>\n<p>Mason said: <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>For decades, SETI searches have concentrated on a relatively small part of the radio spectrum. We wanted to ask what might happen if we looked somewhere very different. The millimeter and submillimeter radio bands remain almost completely unexplored for SETI, so this is really about opening up a new area of parameter space to search.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>To start, the team looked at four archived ALMA observations. They were looking for narrowband radio signals that did not look natural. Astronomers call these technosignatures.<\/p>\n<p>So far, they haven\u2019t found any technosignatures. But their first attempt did reveal a hidden opportunity within every radio observation. Every time a radio telescope points at its target, it captures a myriad of other stars in its field of view.<\/p>\n<h3>Stars beyond the main target<\/h3>\n<p>Every time a radio telescope points at its target, it\u2019s capturing data from its goal plus a slew of stars in the same field of view. Astronomers call this the <em>stellar bycatch<\/em>. Astronomers use data from ESA\u2019s Gaia mission to get an idea of what population is within this stellar bycatch. <\/p>\n<p>But Mason and team used the Besan\u00e7on Galactic Model to get a better estimate of the full stellar population in each observation. Gaia has restrictions in magnitude (the brightness of stars) and distance, among other issues. So the Besan\u00e7on Galactic Model allowed the team to get a fuller look at what might be in their data.<\/p>\n<p>For example, the Besan\u00e7on Galactic Model revealed that a previous SETI survey of 1,327 telescope pointings really included more than 6.1 million stars in total. The Gaia estimate had identified only 288,000 stars. Mason said:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>One of the most exciting things about this work is realizing that we\u2019ve surveyed many more stars than initially thought. Even a very small observation can contain a huge number and diversity of stars that we might never have intended to study. By combining high-frequency observations with galactic simulations, we can better understand exactly what we\u2019ve searched and where we should look next.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<figure id=\"attachment_553296\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-553296\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/earthsky.org\/upl\/2026\/07\/Stellar-Bycatch-Graphic-with-legend-Louisa-Mason-e1784900604346.png\" alt=\"Graphic showing a radio telescope looking at a region of the sky full of colored dots, with a key to the colors.\" width=\"800\" height=\"634\" class=\"size-full wp-image-553296\"\/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-553296\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">This graphic shows the wide range of stellar objects that a radio telescope can capture within a single pointing. Image via Louisa Mason.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Bottom line: Some astronomers believe we should search for alien signals at higher radio frequencies than those traditionally used in SETI. They\u2019ve already begun doing just that.<\/p>\n<p>Via Royal Astronomical Society<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"cp-load-after-post\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"post-author\">\n<h4>Kelly Kizer Whitt<\/h4>\n<p>                    View Articles\n                  <\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"post-tags\">\n<h6 data-udy-fe=\"text_7c58270d\">About the Author:<\/h6>\n<p>Kelly Kizer Whitt &#8211; EarthSky\u2019s nature and travel vlogger on YouTube &#8211; writes and edits some of the most fascinating stories at EarthSky.org. She&#8217;s been writing about science, with a focus on astronomy, for decades. She began her career at Astronomy Magazine and made regular contributions to other outlets, including AstronomyToday and the Sierra Club. She has nine published books, including a children&#8217;s picture book, Solar System Forecast, and a young adult dystopian novel, A Different Sky.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/earthsky.org\/space\/listening-alien-intelligence-wrong-channel-high-frequency\/?rand=772280\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This is the Atacama Large Millimeter\/submillimeter Array (ALMA) radio telescope in the Chilean Andes. Here, it\u2019s observing the sky on a night when the moon (not pictured) brightens the darkness.&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":803142,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-803141","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-earth-sky"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/803141","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=803141"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/803141\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/803142"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=803141"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=803141"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=803141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}