- \n
- Venus has no moon.<\/strong> But did it have one in the past?<\/li>\n
- A new study from researchers<\/strong> in the U.S. and France suggests that it did.<\/li>\n
- The moon likely would have lasted up to nearly 2 billion years<\/strong> before being destroyed by Venus\u2019 gravity.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Science news, night sky events and beautiful photos, all in one place.<\/strong> Click here to subscribe to our free daily newsletter.<\/p>\n
Venus had a moon billions of years ago<\/h3>\n
Venus is one of only two planets in our solar system that doesn\u2019t have a moon. But that doesn\u2019t mean it couldn\u2019t have had one in the past.<\/p>\n
In a new study, researchers have found that Venus probably did have a moon, and for nearly 2 billion years. The team, from the University of California, Riverside, and the University of Bordeaux, CNRS, in France, said on September 2, 2026, that Venus likely eventually consumed its moon. Venus\u2019 gravity would likely have ripped the moon apart, forming a temporary ring around the planet.<\/p>\n
Our solar system is about 4.5 billion years old. Venus\u2019 moon would have formed in the early stages of the formation process. So if it lasted almost 2 billion years, then that means Venus lost its moon about 2.5 billion years ago.<\/p>\n
The researchers submitted their not-yet peer-reviewed paper to the arXiv preprint server on September 2, 2026.<\/p>\n
Moon suffers cataclysmic fate<\/h3>\n
If Venus had a moon, why did it get destroyed? It likely had to do with how Venus spins on its axis. It rotates slower than Earth, completing a rotation every 243 days with respect to the sun. Its orbit, by comparison, is 225 days.<\/p>\n
The slower rotation means that the moon would have transferred angular momentum to Venus. That would have caused the moon to gradually move closer to Venus. That\u2019s the opposite of Earth\u2019s moon, which is slowly moving farther away.<\/p>\n
Lead author Stephen Kane at University of California, Riverside, said:<\/p>\n
\n
The moon is transferring angular momentum inward instead of outward. It causes the moon\u2019s orbit to catastrophically collapse.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
But when did the moon actually begin to disintegrate? That would happen when it reached the Roche limit, at about 9,321 miles (15,000 km) above Venus. Kane said:<\/p>\n
\n
That\u2019s where Venus\u2019 gravity rips the moon apart and consumption occurs.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Millions to billions of years<\/h3>\n
How long the moon survived will have depended on its mass. If it was about half the mass of our own moon, it would have survived about 1.7 billion years. But if it was twice that mass, it would have only lasted about 30 million years.<\/p>\n
![\"Man](\"https:\/\/earthsky.org\/upl\/2026\/09\/Stephen-Kane-University-of-California-Riverside.jpeg\")
Stephen Kane at University of California, Riverside, led the new study into Venus\u2019 possible ancient moon. Image via UC Riverside.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n Difficult to prove that Venus had a moon<\/h3>\n
Although the models strongly suggest an ancient moon, proving it is difficult. That\u2019s because there\u2019s nothing left of it. The debris, the researchers say, fell into the atmosphere and was destroyed. As Paul Byrne at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, explained:<\/p>\n
\n
It\u2019s exceedingly hard to test this idea because there is basically nothing left behind.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
What about debris on the surface? That\u2019s also unlikely, since the surface is so extremely hot and corrosive. And erupting volcanoes have resurfaced the surface many times over.<\/p>\n
There could still be some evidence underground though. Scientists could find it by studying seismic waves moving through Venus\u2019 interior. Kane noted:<\/p>\n
\n
That would tell us a lot.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
![\"Black-and-white](\"https:\/\/earthsky.org\/upl\/2026\/08\/venus-rings-800x450.webp\")
Venus might not have a moon anymore, but it does have rings \u2026 in its atmosphere! This view in polarized light reveals a set of concentric rings \u2013 really, atmospheric ripples in the dense, high atmosphere of Venus. Image via Gourav Mahapatra\/ The Planetary Science Journal.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n Habitability of Venus<\/h3>\n
We know that Earth\u2019s moon has played a role in helping to keep our planet habitable. What about Venus? Some studies have suggested that Venus was once more earthlike, perhaps even with oceans. But then something happened that caused a global greenhouse effect. The surface temperatures on Venus soared until the planet was uninhabitable. Could the destruction of a moon have been responsible for that? It\u2019s possible, as Kane surmised:<\/p>\n
\n
If there was an early habitable period of Venus, then the big question is what brought that to an end. It could definitely be connected to Venus\u2019 runaway greenhouse state.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
It\u2019s fascinating to think that Venus might have once had a moon. What did it look like? How big was it? What was it made of? Hopefully those questions will be answered in the future.<\/p>\n
And while Venus might not have a moon anymore, it does have rings \u2026 in its clouds!<\/p>\n
Bottom line: Venus had a moon a long time ago, scientists in the US and France say. It likely survived for nearly two billion years until Venus\u2019 gravity tore it apart.<\/p>\n
Source: Tidal Demise: The Evolution and Fate of a Hypothetical Venus Moon<\/p>\n
Via New Scientist<\/p>\n
Read more: Peptides in Venus\u2019 clouds could form life-giving shapes<\/p>\n
Read more: Venus brightest in the evening sky this week<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n
\n - A new study from researchers<\/strong> in the U.S. and France suggests that it did.<\/li>\n