An international team of analysts reports evidence that suggests it is not likely that the peer review process is to blame for gender publishing inequalities in scholarly journals. In their paper published in the journal Science Advances, the group describes their study of the peer review process for 145 scholarly journals to determine if there were gender biases and what they found.
Click here for original story, Analysis: Peer review process unlikely to be primary cause of gender publishing inequalities in scholarly journals
Source: Phys.org